Add to ORKGFirms that provide training to their labor force may risk ex post opportunistic behavior on the part of their workers or of competing firms. Some arguably restrictive firm practices that have been justified by this concern include employment contracts restricting the freedom of workers to seek employment from the firm’s competitors and agreements among competing firms not to solicit or hire certain of each other’s workers – sometimes termed “non-compete” and “no poach” agreements, respectively. This Note considers these two categories of practices in the context of recent public discussions and enforcement actions by the US competition law enforcement agencies
We explore the impacts of different antitrust regimes on managers’ labor contracts, when shareholder...
Mergers of competitors are conventionally challenged under the federal antitrust laws when they thre...
We study the effects of noncompete agreements in an environment where firms invest in training junio...
Today, unlike in years past, labor is much more likely to be viewed as the victim and not the perpet...
As of late, labor markets have been a focus point in antitrust enforcement. In 2016 the Department ...
RESTRAINTS ON WORKERS’ WAGES AND MOBILITY: NO-POACH AGREEMENTS AND THE ANTITRUST LAW
As of late, there has been a concerted push in the Biden administration, backed by prominent academi...
Restrictive covenants are an increasingly common feature of employment, used across a wide range of ...
Not long ago, economists denied the existence of monopsony in labor markets. Today, scholars are tal...
Agreements not to compete are generally an anathema to free market advocates. Independent profit max...
Employees are increasingly mobile across state lines. This is partly the result of technological cha...
article published in law reviewEmployment contracts for most employees are not publicly available, l...
Businesses increasingly rely on employee non-compete agreements to protect their assets and forestal...
The “agreement on non-competition” is essentially the extension of the protection of the basic econo...
For over three centuries, Anglo-American courts have assessed employee noncompete agreements under a...
We explore the impacts of different antitrust regimes on managers’ labor contracts, when shareholder...
Mergers of competitors are conventionally challenged under the federal antitrust laws when they thre...
We study the effects of noncompete agreements in an environment where firms invest in training junio...
Today, unlike in years past, labor is much more likely to be viewed as the victim and not the perpet...
As of late, labor markets have been a focus point in antitrust enforcement. In 2016 the Department ...
RESTRAINTS ON WORKERS’ WAGES AND MOBILITY: NO-POACH AGREEMENTS AND THE ANTITRUST LAW
As of late, there has been a concerted push in the Biden administration, backed by prominent academi...
Restrictive covenants are an increasingly common feature of employment, used across a wide range of ...
Not long ago, economists denied the existence of monopsony in labor markets. Today, scholars are tal...
Agreements not to compete are generally an anathema to free market advocates. Independent profit max...
Employees are increasingly mobile across state lines. This is partly the result of technological cha...
article published in law reviewEmployment contracts for most employees are not publicly available, l...
Businesses increasingly rely on employee non-compete agreements to protect their assets and forestal...
The “agreement on non-competition” is essentially the extension of the protection of the basic econo...
For over three centuries, Anglo-American courts have assessed employee noncompete agreements under a...
We explore the impacts of different antitrust regimes on managers’ labor contracts, when shareholder...
Mergers of competitors are conventionally challenged under the federal antitrust laws when they thre...
We study the effects of noncompete agreements in an environment where firms invest in training junio...